One’s definition of society Essay

linguistic mise en scene is e really a literary argument found in the award attractive novel The Handmaids Tale by Margaret Atwood. At introductory it seems to make sense just now upon closer investigation it raises the question, Is there no much(prenominal)(prenominal) thing as justness? To be able to firmness this question it is important to find the appropriate expositions of fair play and context. Then it is infallible to explore the depth of the relationships between the two concepts. Only subsequently these conditions present been met is it possible to answer the question, Is there no such thing as lawfulness?To be able to understand the concept of justness is actually difficult but it is possible. Dictionary.com gives ten disagreeent renderings of fairness, each acceptable in its own sense. For the purpose of this essay the definition that is best is rightfulness is an self-explanatory or accepted particular. The Constructivist theory as well as the Cons ensus theory also support this idea of impartiality. The constructivist theory spots our familiarity as constructed because it does not reflect any external realities.Basically prop unrivallednts of this theory turn overd that right deal be socially constructed. Karl Marx also claimed the existence of objective rectitude but he was able to distinguish between accredited knowledge and knowledge that had been distorted through power or ideology. The consensus theorists had a homogeneous view. They believed that integrity is whatever is agreed upon or might come to be agreed upon by some specified group. Both theories coincide with the definition of loyalty provided above but the constructivist theory also makes a clear distinction between objective lawfulness and truth that is socially accepted. In order to answer the question above it is important to define objective truth as well as truth that is socially accepted. the true can classified further into two subcategories which are objective truth and truth that is socially accepted. Objective truth is very much wish a universal truth which is a fact or a statement that is accepted by every whizz and is proven using more than whiz area of knowledge. An modeling of universal truth would be that gravity causes all objects thrown in the air to fall back to the ground. This statement would be considered a universal truth because it has been proven using more than one area of knowledge (science and mathematics) and it is a fact that most people accept. uprightness that is socially accepted is depends on ones definition of society.My definition of society is that it is an organized group of persons associated together for religious, cultural, political, patriotic or antithetic purposes. An cause of such a truth would be the fact that recognize killings are accepted in certain parts of the world but are rejected in former(a)s. This shows how peoples perceptions of truth differ based on societal rul es and regulations. The distinction between objective truth and truth that is socially accepted is also clearly defined and provides us with a platform to equalize both of these to context.To be able to compare the concepts of context and truth it is important for us to define context. To me context performer the part of a text or statement that environs a busy word or passage and determines its meaning. According to Wikipedia Context includes the circumstances and conditions that surround an event. Ironically it also provides at least twelve disparate definitions of context giving an excellent example of the word itself. Upon further outline of the definition of context it is clear to see how truth and context drop dead together. The definition of context states that it is part of a text or statement that surrounds a particular word or passage and determines its meaning.The text or statement to which it is referring can be replaced by the truth. Thus, context refers to the i nformation meet the truth. Context is also very important in understanding the truth because misinterpretation of the context could lead to a false impression of the truth. So, after defining both context and truth it seems to me that both of these aspects go croak in hand and each relies on the other to convey its true meaning.To be able to further investigate the relationship between truth and context, I decided to first compare objective truth and truth which is socially acceptable. I defined objective truth as a universal truth or a fact that is well accepted. The example of objective truth mentioned above is a good example of misinterpretation of truth when the context is changed. Such a fact was not cognise in the middle ages and one would be considered crazy if they believed in such theories. Such a statement is only considered a universal truth in todays world and context. But if the context close to the fact were changed whence the fact itself would be considered untr ue.Thus, the context around the truth is equally as important as the truth. Another way to view the context from the truth is to see them as two separate identities. The context provides the reader background information about the truth and if the context is misinterpreted then the truth gets distorted providing the reader with a false impression. Thus, objective truth can also be misinterpreted depending on its context.There is also a relationship between truth which is socially acceptable and context. It is quite sympathetic to the relationship between objective truth and context. Something that is considered truth in one society may be viewed as false in another. An example of this is the different views on staged marriages held in different societies. For example in western society this practice is very uncommon but in most eastern societies arranged marriages are encouraged and it is a very common practice. Thus, societys different views on such a topic would elicit different versions of truth from different people. This would occur because of the different societal views that people have been raised in. The context in this campaign would be the views of the society which in turn would influence their views on arranged marriages. Therefore, truth that is socially acceptable also depends on its context.Therefore, context and truth are both terms that rely on each other to be understood. Without context it would be difficult to understand the truth. Objective truth as well as socially acceptable truth both rely on context to be understood and depend on each other to provide the reader with the clear meaning. Since, truth can not be understood without context then I believe that no such thing as truth exists. A fact that is considered true now may not be considered true later on because of different contexts. Therefore, it is safe to say that the context determines the truth so, no such thing as truth exists.